medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Speaker A: "It would be a mistake to cut funding for the space program. Scientific discoveries from space research have generated technologies worth billions in commercial applications."
Speaker B: "Those same billions could have been generated more efficiently if the funds had been invested directly into Earth-based medical research instead."
On the basis of their statements, Speaker A and Speaker B are committed to disagreeing about which of the following?
- Whether routing the same dollars into terrestrial medical research would have yielded comparable commercial value at lower cost than the space program did.
- Whether improving human health ought to be the chief objective guiding the space program.
- Whether any of the commercial technologies attributed to space research genuinely originated there.
- Whether the dollar value generated by space research is large enough to be called substantial.
- Whether Earth-based medical research is presently funded at an appropriate level.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?