medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Researcher A: The data suggests that increased screen time leads to shorter attention spans in adolescents. Researcher B: That can't be right. Adolescents today consume more information through screens than any previous generation. The increased volume of information actually trains the brain to process data faster.
Researchers A and B disagree about whether
- greater screen time harms adolescents' attention spans.
- today’s adolescents absorb more information overall.
- teens in general should be urged to cut their screen time.
- the human brain can be trained to process new information faster.
- the attention-span studies were properly designed and conducted.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ