medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Speaker A: The university should increase tuition to fund the construction of a new student center. This will enhance the campus experience and attract better applicants. Speaker B: Tuition is already too high for many students. We should focus on improving our existing facilities rather than building new ones that will only drive up costs further.
Speaker A and Speaker B are committed to disagreeing with each other about whether
- the university ought to raise tuition in order to pay for building a new student center
- the university's existing facilities are currently in need of improvement
- the university's present tuition level is fair to all of its students
- a new student center would in fact succeed in attracting stronger applicants
- the university should undertake any construction projects whatsoever in the coming years
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ