medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Speaker A: To reduce the city budget deficit, we must eliminate funding for the upcoming annual arts festival. The festival costs the city millions in police overtime and sanitation services. Speaker B: The arts festival is the primary driver of tourism in our city. The tax revenue generated from hotel stays and restaurant meals during that week far exceeds the city expenses you mentioned.
Speakers A and B are most likely to disagree about which of the following?
- whether, on balance, the festival leaves the city's finances better or worse off
- whether private corporate sponsorship would be a superior way to bankroll the festival
- whether the festival generates substantial municipal costs for policing and sanitation
- whether trimming the budget deficit ought to be local government's foremost objective
- whether the festival draws more out-of-town visitors than any other city event
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ