hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Tariq: The referee was right to call off the match. The pitch had become genuinely dangerous, and player safety must always take precedence over finishing a game. Wells: The conditions were dangerous, I grant that. But calling off the match was the wrong decision: the players themselves wanted to keep going, and the risk was theirs to accept.
Tariq and Wells disagree over whether
- whether the dangerous pitch could have been repaired quickly enough for the match to resume later
- The referee's decision to call off the match was correct
- The players wanted the match to continue
- The playing conditions had become dangerous
- Player safety should always outweigh finishing a game
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement…
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
- No one who is tired can concentrate. Peter is not tired… Which of the following correctly…
All Logical Reasoning questions · LSAT study guide · LSAT glossary · LSAT flashcards