medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A museum administrator argues that the museum's newly installed exhibits were a success, citing the fact that attendance climbed by 40% in the months after they opened.
The administrator's argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?
- Visitors drawn by the new exhibits lingered in the museum for noticeably longer stretches than in earlier years
- None of the museum's older traditional exhibits had ever been genuinely enjoyed by a single past visitor.
- The rise in attendance was not chiefly produced by some other factor, such as a major advertising campaign.
- Interactive exhibits of this newly installed kind are the only available means by which a museum can draw crowds.
- The museum's admission fees and operating hours both remained entirely unchanged across the whole period.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ