medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The primary purpose of a university is to prepare students for the workforce. Since the current curriculum in the Humanities department does not include mandatory internships or vocational training, the department is failing to fulfill the university's primary purpose.
The argument above is flawed in that it
- condemns the Humanities department out of an undisclosed bias against the liberal arts
- ignores that many Humanities students may not intend to join the workforce right away
- assumes that internships and vocational training are the sole means of preparing students for work
- supposes that the Humanities department outranks every other department in importance
- takes the absence of one program as conclusive proof that no preparation is occurring at all
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?