medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The primary purpose of a university is to prepare students for the workforce. Since the current curriculum in the Humanities department does not include mandatory internships or vocational training, the department is failing to fulfill the university's primary purpose.
The argument above is flawed in that it
- condemns the Humanities department out of an undisclosed personal bias against the liberal arts
- ignores that many Humanities students may simply not intend to join the workforce right away
- assumes that internships and vocational training are the sole means of preparing students for work
- supposes that the Humanities department clearly outranks every other campus department in importance
- takes the absence of one named program as conclusive proof that no preparation is occurring at all
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ