medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Any book that is a bestseller must be well-written. 'The Golden Compass' is well-written. Therefore, it must be a bestseller.
The argument above is logically equivalent to which one of the following?
- From 'bestseller implies well-written' and the fact that the book is well-written, it concludes the book is a bestseller.
- From 'bestseller implies well-written' and the fact that the book is not a bestseller, it concludes the book is not well-written.
- From 'well-written implies bestseller' and the fact that the book is not a bestseller, it concludes the book is not well-written.
- From 'well-written implies bestseller' and the fact that the book is well-written, it concludes the book is a bestseller.
- From 'bestseller implies well-written' and the fact that the book is a bestseller, it concludes the book is well-written.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ