easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
To be eligible for the scholarship, a student must have a GPA of at least 3.8. Mark has a GPA of 3.9. Therefore, Mark is eligible for the scholarship.
The argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that it
- ignores the possibility that Mark's grade-point average could fall before the award is made
- shifts the sense in which the term 'eligible' is used from the premise to the conclusion
- rejects a conclusion merely because the support offered for it is by itself insufficient
- treats a requirement for an outcome as though meeting it were enough to secure that outcome
- assumes that no applicant other than Mark could possibly satisfy the stated requirement
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ