easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
To get a driver's license, one must pass a vision test. Since John has a driver's license, he must have passed a vision test.
The argument proceeds by
- reasoning that, because an outcome was attained, a precondition for that outcome was necessarily satisfied.
- treating a sufficient condition as though it were merely a necessary one.
- offering a causal account of why John chose to obtain a license.
- extending John's particular case into a rule about drivers in general.
- establishing that passing a vision test by itself guarantees one a license.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?