medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning

No professional athlete who uses banned substances is eligible for the Hall of Fame. Since Thompson is ineligible for the Hall of Fame, it follows that Thompson must have used a banned substance.

The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

  1. Thompson competed professionally for many years across numerous full seasons before finally retiring from the sport.
  2. Thompson is a professional athlete who has repeatedly been publicly accused of using banned performance substances.
  3. Some athletes who remain fully eligible for the Hall of Fame have never even once used any banned substance whatsoever.
  4. Using banned substances is the sole basis on which a professional athlete can be ruled ineligible for the Hall of Fame.
  5. No professional athlete who is currently eligible for the Hall of Fame has ever once used any banned substance.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials