medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Manager: Any employee who consistently exceeds her sales targets deserves a bonus. Priya has exceeded her sales targets every quarter this year. Therefore, Priya deserves a bonus and should be promoted to a regional position.
The conclusion of the manager's argument follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
- Any employee who exceeds her sales targets every quarter of a year deserves a bonus and should be promoted to a regional position.
- Any employee who genuinely deserves a performance bonus also deserves public recognition from the company for it.
- Employees who exceed their quarterly sales targets in every quarter typically go on to perform very well in regional positions.
- No employee should ever be promoted to a regional position unless she has consistently exceeded her assigned sales targets.
- Most employees who consistently exceed their quarterly sales targets do, in the end, receive some form of internal promotion.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?