easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Iris: A photograph can be a genuine work of art. The photographer chooses the framing, the light, and the moment, and those choices express a unique artistic vision. Dan: Pressing a shutter merely records whatever is already in front of the lens. Genuine art requires the artist to build the image by hand, so a photograph never qualifies.
The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Iris and Dan disagree about whether
- Genuine art requires the artist to build the image by hand
- Photographers select the framing and lighting of their shots
- whether every photograph expresses a unique artistic vision
- Photography is a widely practiced medium today
- A photograph can be a genuine work of art
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?