medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A nutritionist claims that drinking green tea daily improves long-term memory. A reviewer states: Each of the following, if true, would weaken the nutritionist's claim, except for one finding, which would instead leave the claim untouched.
The finding that would leave the nutritionist's claim untouched is most likely one that
- neither casts doubt on nor lends support to the link between green tea and memory, but is simply irrelevant to it.
- most strongly proves that green tea is responsible for improved memory.
- shows that green tea actively harms memory in the long term.
- uses the most forceful and absolute wording of any of the five findings.
- directly establishes that improved memory causes people to drink more green tea.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?