medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The board of directors must either approve the merger or risk the company going bankrupt. Since the board has decided not to approve the merger, the company will definitely go bankrupt.
The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following?
- The city must either raise taxes or cut services. Because the mayor has promised not to raise taxes, services will be cut.
- Either we build a new school or we will have overcrowded classrooms. We have decided to build a new school, so we will not have overcrowded classrooms.
- To graduate, you must pass either a math exam or a science exam. Since you didn't pass the math exam, you must pass the science exam.
- We can go to the beach or go to the mountains. If we go to the beach, we will need sunscreen. So we will need sunscreen.
- Either it will rain or it will be sunny. It did not rain. Therefore, it was sunny.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?