medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning

The board of directors must either approve the merger or risk the company going bankrupt. Since the board has decided not to approve the merger, the company will definitely go bankrupt.

The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following?

  1. The city must either raise taxes or cut services. Because the mayor has promised not to raise taxes, services will be cut.
  2. Either we build a new school or we will have overcrowded classrooms. We have decided to build a new school, so we will not have overcrowded classrooms.
  3. To graduate, you must pass either a math exam or a science exam. Since you didn't pass the math exam, you must pass the science exam.
  4. We can go to the beach or go to the mountains. If we go to the beach, we will need sunscreen. So we will need sunscreen.
  5. Either it will rain or it will be sunny. It did not rain. Therefore, it was sunny.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 46,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials