easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A manager is deciding how to allocate bonuses among a team of employees. One employee produced significantly more work than the others, but the manager decides to give equal bonuses to everyone to avoid creating resentment and to encourage future collaboration within the team.
The manager's decision most closely conforms to which one of the following principles?
- Sustaining team morale and cooperation can outweigh rewarding differences in individual output.
- A manager should always direct the single greatest reward to whichever employee proved most productive.
- Individual resentment among coworkers is the chief cause of low workplace productivity.
- Bonuses ought to be reserved for those employees who have shown a sustained rise in productivity.
- Equal pay should hold only when individual contributions are roughly comparable in size.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ