easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Movie Critic: The use of CGI has ruined modern action movies. It lacks the physical weight and realism of practical stunts, making the action feel hollow. Director: CGI allows us to show things that were previously impossible to film. It expands the creative possibilities of the medium and provides spectacles that audiences love.
The movie critic and the director are most likely to disagree about which one of the following?
- whether practical stunts cost more to film than digital effects do
- whether audiences enjoy watching grand spectacles
- whether every scene could feasibly be shot using practical stunts alone
- whether the reliance on CGI has harmed modern action cinema
- whether digital effects can match the realism of stunts
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ