medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning

History Professor: My critics argue that my latest book contains several factual errors. However, these critics are all members of a rival school of thought that has long been obsessed with discrediting my research. Therefore, their claims can be safely ignored.

The professor's argument is most similar in its flaw to which of the following?

  1. A senator brushes aside an unfavorable emissions report solely because the analysts who produced it were paid by advocacy groups opposed to the industry.
  2. A physician disregards a patient's confident self-diagnosis on the sole ground that the patient lacks any formal medical training or relevant clinical experience.
  3. A judge steps aside from presiding over a trial because she happens to be a close personal friend of the defendant and his immediate family members.
  4. A researcher rejects a newly proposed theory because it squarely conflicts with several well-established physical laws that decades of experiments have confirmed.
  5. A reviewer praises a recent study chiefly because its authors are widely respected senior figures whose past work the field has long admired and cited.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials