easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Most successful CEOs follow a morning routine. Therefore, if I start following a morning routine, I will become a successful CEO.
The reasoning above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it:
- treats a habit that merely tends to accompany success as though adopting it were enough to produce that success
- never makes clear precisely which morning activities a genuine 'morning routine' is actually supposed to include
- disregards that a great many ordinary people who keep morning routines never go on to become successful CEOs
- assumes that because some successful CEOs keep such routines, every single one of them must keep one as well
- concludes that no person could ever succeed as a CEO without first deliberately adopting a daily morning routine
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ