medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The board of directors of the National Library has voted to digitize all of its archives. It follows that every individual member of the board must believe digitization is the best possible use of the library's budget.
The reasoning above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
- infers from a body's collective decision that each of its members personally holds the corresponding view.
- takes for granted that digitizing the archives costs more than maintaining them in physical form.
- neglects the possibility that one or more board members were absent when the vote was taken.
- assumes that the chosen digitization effort will in fact succeed in preserving the records.
- treats a single vote as proof that the board will pursue no other initiatives in the future.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?