medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The board of directors of the National Library has voted to digitize all of its archives. It follows that every individual member of the board must believe digitization is the best possible use of the library's budget.
The reasoning above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
- infers from a body's collective decision that each of its members personally holds the corresponding view.
- takes for granted that digitizing the archives will cost more than maintaining them in their physical form.
- neglects the possibility that one or more individual board members were absent when this particular vote was taken.
- assumes without support that the chosen digitization effort will in fact succeed in preserving the library's records.
- treats a single recorded vote as proof that the board will pursue no other separate initiatives in the future.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ