medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Reliable news sources are trustworthy, because they consistently supply information that can be relied upon.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that it:
- offers as support for its conclusion a claim that merely says the same thing in different words
- fails to specify what counts as a 'news source' in the contemporary media landscape
- takes for granted that every trustworthy source is also a consistently reliable one
- rests on an analogy between news sources and other kinds of information providers
- presumes that reliability is the only quality relevant to a source's trustworthiness
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?