easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Every student in the senior class is highly intelligent. Therefore, the senior class as a whole will certainly win the academic decathlon against all other schools.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it:
- transfers a quality possessed by each member of a group to the group's collective performance
- overlooks the possibility that a few of the seniors are not in fact highly intelligent
- supposes that winning an academic decathlon is the only valid gauge of intelligence
- treats a condition sufficient for intelligence as though it were necessary for victory
- assumes the senior class has practiced together long enough to function as a coordinated team
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ