easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Reporter: The new stadium will be a boon for the local economy. It will create thousands of construction jobs and attract tourists who will spend money at nearby businesses. Economist: Stadium projects are rarely profitable for cities. The public subsidies required to build them almost always exceed the tax revenue generated by the stadium's operation.
The reporter and the economist disagree over whether:
- tax receipts are the only legitimate yardstick for judging a stadium's success
- the stadium is likely to leave the city better off economically on balance
- the construction phase of the stadium will generate employment
- the stadium will succeed in drawing any visitors to the area
- public subsidies for the stadium will exceed the revenue its operations produce
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ