hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Every research team that shared raw data published either a replication or a correction. No team that published a correction claimed its original estimate was precise. Some data-sharing teams claimed their original estimates were precise. All replications were preregistered.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?
- Every team that published a preregistered replication shared its raw data.
- At least one data-sharing team published both a replication and a correction.
- Some preregistered replication came from a data-sharing team claiming its original estimate precise.
- No team that claimed its original estimate was in fact precise published a replication, during the years covered by the publication review.
- Some team that did not share raw data published a preregistered replication.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?