hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
In each district, more than half of the registered beekeepers use removable-frame hives. Every beekeeper who uses such hives either harvests honey commercially or participates in the mite-monitoring network. In District R, fewer than half of registered beekeepers harvest honey commercially.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?
- Fewer than half of District R's removable-frame users harvest honey commercially.
- District R's commercial honey harvesters and mite-network participants are disjoint groups.
- At least one District R beekeeper both harvests commercially and participates in the mite network.
- More than half of District R's registered beekeepers participate in the mite-monitoring network.
- At least one registered beekeeper in District R participates in the mite-monitoring network.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?