medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A wine may be labeled 'estate bottled' only if every grape used to make it was grown on land owned by the winery. Some of the grapes used in Northcliff Vineyards' Reserve White were purchased from neighboring farms.
The statements above most strongly support which one of the following?
- Northcliff may label any wine estate bottled whenever every grape used in it was grown on Northcliff's land.
- Northcliff may label the Reserve White 'estate bottled' if the purchased grapes came from land it later acquired.
- Northcliff Vineyards' Reserve White does not qualify to be labeled 'estate bottled.'
- Northcliff grows all of the grapes it uses in its wines.
- Wines made partly from purchased grapes are of lower quality than estate-bottled wines.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?