medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A restaurant critic maintains that a dish merits a recommendation only if it is both skillfully prepared and reasonably priced. She judged the roast duck at a certain restaurant to be skillfully prepared but substantially overpriced.
The statements above most strongly support which one of the following about the critic?
- She considers the restaurant's other dishes to be overpriced as well.
- The critic would recommend the roast duck if the restaurant lowered its price enough to make it reasonable.
- She would not recommend the roast duck.
- She considers the roast duck to have been poorly prepared.
- She would recommend any dish that is reasonably priced.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement…
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
- No one who is tired can concentrate. Peter is not tired… Which of the following correctly…
All Logical Reasoning questions · LSAT study guide · LSAT glossary · LSAT flashcards