easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A university is deciding whether to use its surplus budget to offer more scholarships or to build a new student recreation center. The university chooses to offer scholarships, stating that its fundamental goal is to increase access to education for students from diverse backgrounds.
The university's choice most closely conforms to which one of the following principles?
- Funds should be channeled toward widening access to education before being spent on facilities that serve non-academic ends.
- Diversity of student background should be the sole criterion governing every university's admissions and enrollment decisions.
- A recreation center matters less to students' physical health than their classroom academic performance ultimately does.
- A university should construct any new recreational facility only after granting a full scholarship to every qualified applicant.
- A university should spend its entire surplus on whichever single option the largest share of its students would prefer.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ