medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Tomas: Once the plant automates its assembly line, it will run with far fewer workers than it employs today, so the number of people it employs will shrink. Priya: Automation will cut the plant's production costs, letting it lower prices and win enough new orders to expand output. To handle that growth it will end up employing more people, not fewer.
Their statements provide the most support for the claim that Tomas and Priya disagree about whether
- The plant will automate its assembly line
- A smaller workforce would in fact be bad for the surrounding community, because the reduction in employment would lower spending at nearby businesses
- Automating the assembly line will reduce the number of people the plant employs
- whether automation will lower the plant's production costs
- Automation will allow the plant to lower its prices
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?