easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The museum should retain timed entry. Lines became shorter, and the number of visitors served did not fall.
What role does the statement “Lines became shorter.” play?
- It is an objection the argument rejects.
- It is an assumption left unstated.
- It is unrelated historical background.
- It is a premise supporting the recommendation.
- It is the main conclusion.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?