easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
No expired pass is valid. Pass P is expired. Therefore, Pass P is not valid.
Which argument uses the most similar pattern of reasoning?
- Jar K is sealed and labeled. Therefore, all sealed jars are labeled.
- No blue tags are numbered. Tag K is blue. Therefore, Tag K is not numbered.
- Some labeled jars are sealed. Jar K is labeled. Therefore, Jar K is sealed.
- All sealed jars are labeled. Jar K is labeled. Therefore, Jar K is sealed.
- No sealed jars are labeled. Jar K is sealed. Therefore, every jar is unlabeled.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?