easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The account has two-factor authentication enabled. Therefore, it meets the new security rule.
Which assumption, if added, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn?
- The stated conclusion would be convenient for the organization and for many of the people affected by it.
- Every account using two-factor authentication meets the new rule.
- Some accounts do not satisfy the conclusion because of circumstances not stated in the argument.
- The account was discussed at length yesterday by people familiar with the surrounding circumstances.
- Most surveyed people prefer this type of account to alternatives they previously encountered.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?