easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A city pass for museums was introduced to encourage tourism. The pass offered unlimited entry to 10 major museums for a single flat fee. Surprisingly, during the year the pass was introduced, total revenue for the 10 museums decreased, even though the total number of museum visits increased.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the apparent discrepancy described above?
- Because the flat fee was priced below what individual tickets to even three of the museums would have cost, pass holders effectively paid far less per visit than ticket buyers had.
- The city's tourism bureau devoted a sizable share of its annual budget to advertising the newly launched museum pass.
- Visitors holding the pass typically lingered for a shorter time in each museum than did patrons who had purchased single-entry tickets.
- Two of the participating museums mounted prominent, widely publicized special exhibitions during the year the pass was offered.
- Roughly the same number of out-of-town tourists visited the city during the year of the pass as had visited the previous year.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?