medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
To win the championship, the team must win its next three games. The team won its game tonight. Therefore, the team's chances of winning the championship have improved.
Which of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Tonight's victory did not appreciably lower the team's odds of winning either of the two games still to come.
- Winning all three of the upcoming games would, by itself, be enough to clinch the championship for the team this season.
- No other team still remaining in the league this season is as genuinely talented as the team in question now is.
- The team is currently favored to win each of the two regular-season games still remaining on its schedule.
- Tonight's win was achieved without any of the team's key starting players suffering a significant injury.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?