medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
No one who has not completed the safety training is allowed on the factory floor. Because Miller is currently on the factory floor, Miller must have completed the safety training.
Which of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning used in the argument?
- It applies the contrapositive of a stated rule to an individual case to reach a valid conclusion.
- It mistakes a condition that is necessary for floor access for one that is sufficient.
- It uses a single counterexample to overturn a general claim about safety procedures.
- It concludes that a property of a group must hold of each individual member of that group.
- It treats completion of the safety training as something that guarantees access to the factory floor.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ