easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
No reptiles are warm-blooded. All snakes are reptiles. Therefore, no snakes are warm-blooded.
Which one of the following arguments exhibits a pattern of reasoning most similar to that in the argument above?
- No metals are transparent. All copper samples are metals. Therefore, some copper samples are not transparent.
- No deserts are humid. Most deserts are hot. Therefore, most hot regions are not humid.
- No birds are wingless. All penguins are birds. Therefore, all penguins can fly.
- No fish are mammals. No mammals are cold-blooded. Therefore, no fish are cold-blooded.
- No metals are transparent. All copper is a metal. Therefore, no copper is transparent.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?