medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
You cannot enter the VIP lounge unless you have a golden ticket. Sarah entered the VIP lounge, so she must have had a golden ticket.
Which one of the following arguments follows a pattern of reasoning most similar to that in the argument above?
- A student cannot graduate without passing the final exam. Leo graduated, so he passed the final.
- Whenever it rains, the game is canceled. It is raining, so the game is canceled.
- If you are late, you miss the bus. You were not late, so you did not miss the bus.
- Only employees are allowed in the back. Mike is an employee, so he must be in the back.
- No one may board without a ticket, and everyone holding a ticket always boards, so every ticket-holder is necessarily aboard.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?