medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The oak beam is stronger than the pine beam. The pine beam is stronger than the balsa beam. Therefore, the oak beam is stronger than the balsa beam.
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?
- Maple is denser than cedar. Cedar is denser than fir. Therefore, fir is denser than maple.
- Route A is older than Route B, and Route B is taller than Route C. Therefore, Route A is older than Route C.
- Route A is faster than Route B. Route B is faster than Route C. Therefore, Route A is faster than Route C.
- Sam knows Tara. Tara knows Uma. Therefore, Sam knows Uma.
- The oak beam is stronger than the pine beam. The balsa beam is stronger than the pine beam. Therefore, the oak beam is stronger than the balsa beam.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?