medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A candidate advances if and only if exactly one of the written and oral panels approves. Mira advanced, and the written panel approved. Therefore, the oral panel did not approve.
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?
- A submission is selected exactly when one, but not both, of two judges approves. It was selected and Judge 1 approved, so Judge 2 did not.
- A submission is selected only if exactly one judge approves. Judge 1 approved and Judge 2 did not, so it was selected.
- A submission is selected exactly when at least one of two judges approves. It was selected and Judge 1 approved, so Judge 2 did not.
- A submission is selected exactly when one judge approves. It was not selected and Judge 1 approved, so Judge 2 approved.
- A submission is selected exactly when at least one of two judges approves. It was selected and Judge 1 approved. Therefore Judge 2 did not approve.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?