medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Every treaty that limits inspections requires either satellite monitoring or on-site observers. No treaty with on-site observers permits secret facilities. Treaty V limits inspections and permits secret facilities. Therefore, V requires satellite monitoring.
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?
- Every study using sensors or diaries has fewer visits. No diary study enrolls minors. R has fewer visits and enrolls minors. Therefore R uses sensors.
- Sensor or diary studies have fewer visits. No diary study enrolls minors. R has fewer visits and enrolls minors. Therefore R uses sensors.
- Every reduced-visit study uses sensors or diaries. No diary study enrolls minors. Study R has fewer visits and enrolls minors. Therefore R uses sensors.
- Every reduced-visit study uses sensors or diaries. No diary study enrolls minors. R enrolls minors. Therefore R uses sensors.
- Every reduced-visit study uses exactly one of sensors and diaries. R enrolls minors. Therefore R uses sensors.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?