easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
If a student joins the debate club, that student will improve at public speaking. Sarah has improved at public speaking.
Which one of the following can be properly concluded from these statements?
- Had Sarah not joined the debate club, her public speaking would not have improved.
- It cannot be determined from the information given whether Sarah joined the debate club.
- Sarah definitely joined the debate club.
- Sarah definitely did not join the debate club.
- Joining the debate club is the only reliable way for any student to improve at public speaking.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ