medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Consider the claim that no one is a professional athlete unless that person follows a strict diet.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the claim above?
- Anyone who counts as a professional athlete is someone who maintains a strict diet.
- Anyone who maintains a strict diet thereby qualifies as a professional athlete.
- There are people who follow a strict diet yet are not professional athletes.
- A person who does not follow a strict diet might nonetheless be a professional athlete.
- Most people who maintain a strict diet are pursuing a career as a professional athlete.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ