medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A company policy states: Employees are eligible for a bonus only if they exceed their sales targets and have no unexcused absences.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the policy?
- Any employee who is eligible for a bonus has surpassed his or her sales targets
- Any employee who surpasses his or her sales targets will be eligible for a bonus
- An employee with a spotless attendance record is assured of bonus eligibility
- An employee denied bonus eligibility must have had an unexcused absence
- An employee who exceeds targets but is absent without excuse is still eligible for a bonus
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ