medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The city's current stadium is thirty years old. Therefore, the city should build a new stadium.
Which one of the following identifies the most significant gap in the argument's reasoning?
- Age alone does not show that the existing stadium is no longer usable or that building a new one is the only fitting response
- The argument neglects to consider whether the city can afford to construct a new stadium
- The argument simply takes for granted that thirty years is a long life for a building
- The word 'stadium' is employed in two different senses across the argument
- The argument assumes that any building thirty years old is necessarily on the verge of collapse
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?