easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Either the north valve or the south valve caused the pressure loss, but not both. Inspection cleared the north valve. Therefore, replacing the south valve will restore pressure.
Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn?
- A cleared valve can never fail in the future.
- Pressure briefly returned to normal during the valve inspection.
- The south valve is more expensive than the north valve.
- Pressure losses sometimes have several simultaneous causes.
- Replacing whichever valve caused the loss restores pressure.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?