easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
To get a promotion at this firm, an employee must have at least five years of experience. James has six years of experience. Therefore, James will get a promotion.
Which one of the following, if true, most clearly demonstrates the flaw in the reasoning?
- The firm additionally requires that any candidate pass a management examination before becoming eligible for promotion.
- The firm's written promotion policy has been revised several times over the past decade.
- Many employees with well over five years of experience choose not to apply for promotions at all.
- James has more years of experience than several colleagues who were recently promoted.
- No employee at the firm has ever been promoted with fewer than five years of experience.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?