medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A hospital adopted a new hygiene protocol requiring staff to wash their hands 50 percent more often. Yet the rate of hospital-acquired infections did not fall, and in several wards it actually edged upward.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the infection rate failed to decline?
- The far more frequent washing dried and cracked the staff's skin, and those micro-cracks harbored more bacteria than intact skin does.
- The specialized antibacterial soap chosen for the new protocol cost noticeably more per liter than the ordinary brand the hospital had used before.
- Patient satisfaction surveys taken in the weeks after the protocol began showed unusually strong approval of overall visible staff cleanliness.
- Several other comparable hospitals in the region that had staff wash their hands far less often nonetheless reported lower infection rates.
- The relentless constant washing eventually left the staff's hands so badly damaged that no patient could be safely treated by them at all.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ