hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
City ordinance: A food truck permit will not be renewed unless the truck passed its most recent health inspection or the owner has filed a formal appeal within ten days of any failing inspection. Truck 7 failed its most recent health inspection. Truck 7's permit was renewed.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to justify the renewal of Truck 7's permit?
- Truck 7 had passed every health inspection prior to its most recent one.
- The owner of Truck 7 filed a formal appeal within ten days of the failing inspection.
- Most food trucks that fail an inspection do not have their permits renewed that year.
- The health inspector who evaluated Truck 7 has since been reassigned to a different district.
- Truck 7's owner has held a food truck permit in the city for over a decade.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?