medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A survey of local residents found that those who live near the new community center are more likely to participate in fitness classes than residents who live farther away. The town concluded that the community center is successfully promoting physical activity in the neighborhood.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
- People who were already physically active tend to seek out and move into housing situated close to fitness facilities.
- Fitness classes offered at the community center cost noticeably more per session than comparable classes at nearby private gyms.
- The survey happened to be conducted in summer, when residents living all across the town are generally far more active outdoors.
- The community center also runs a wide range of non-fitness programs, such as weekly cooking, painting, and art classes.
- Residents who live far from the center are, on average, no younger in age than the residents who live close to it.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ