medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Archaeologist: The pottery shards we excavated at the coastal site bear glaze patterns identical to those produced only by kilns in the mountain region 200 kilometers inland. We therefore conclude that the coastal settlement traded directly with the mountain communities.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the archaeologist's conclusion?
- No intermediary settlements between the coast and the mountains ever possessed, handled, or redistributed pottery bearing those distinctive glaze patterns.
- The mountain kilns produced a far larger volume of glazed pottery, year after year, than any of the dozens of other kilns then operating across the region.
- The coastal settlement was, by every surviving measure of stored grain and minted coin, the single wealthiest community along the entire seaboard in that era.
- Pottery with patterns superficially similar to, but on close inspection not identical to, those glazes has been recovered at several unrelated inland sites.
- The mountain communities are independently known to have prized, and to have actively sought out, the cured salt and dried fish available only along the coast.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?